|
|
| The Context |
|
Who?
Targeted at ...
|
The tool is designed primarily for use by resource poor goat keepers and especially landless and near landless owners or farmers. Secondarily the technology is directed to agricultural, livestock and veterinary extension and other advisory personnel (public and private sectors including NGOs). |
When?
|
The tool can be used at all times of the year (as goats are largely nonseasonal breeders and produce young throughout the year) by all types of goat keepers. |
Where?
|
Semi-arid tropical and subtropical areas. Not confined to India. |
| Methods |
Two technologies were developed in trials in India in a participatory manner with goat owners. One was the collection and storage of pods of Prosopis juliflora for use during times of acute feed shortage. The second was the use of trichomes of the pods of the creeping legume Mucuna pruriens as an anthelmintic. In addition grass harvested from protected common lands can also make a contribution to alleviating feed shortages at critical times of the year.
|
| |
|
Significant difference between kid from
untreated doe (first from the left)
as compared to two kids from dewormed doe
(in centre and on the right).
|
|
| Resources Required |
The tool should be used at least initially only by families who already own and are familiar with goats and goat production. Assured and long term access to common land will be required by landless farmers. |
| Support |
Some support will be required from public and private advisory services in order to ensure the technology is correctly transferred and properly used. The extension personnel themselves will need to be trained in the technology. Assured access to common land for landless farmers will be required. |
| Costs |
Additional financial costs are small. The main costs are non financial and include spending more time with animals in harvesting feed and the pods to be used as an anthelmintic. As farmers do place an intrinsic value on their time it is important to ensure that the perceived benefits assume dominance over the perceived inconveniences. |
| Benefits |
Application of the first technique (Prosopis pods) led to considerably higher kidding rates (31-45 per cent higher than unsupplemented animals) in goats owned by resource poor farmers.
The second (Mucuna as an anthelmintic) increased growth rates in kids born after their dams had been treated whilst pregnant and may also have contributed to reduced mortality (from 45 per cent down to 12 per cent) and a lower abortion rate (from 28 per cent to 9 per cent).
Benefits to human welfare through increased and more regular availability of high quality products of animal origin were not quantified but are likely to be considerable. |
| Risks |
There are some risks associated with the use of the technology especially for landless people. If they are not assured of long term access to common land there will be little chance of success and of a sustainable outcome. |
| Alternatives |
There are few or no low cost alternatives. |
| Impacts |
If access can be secured to common lands there would be strong positive impacts. Many landless owners of goats including marginalized communities and women would obtain improved welfare from an increase in the availability of goat products. The technology should be sustainable under such conditions and have a beneficial effect on the environment through planting of trees and recycling of nutrients especially by the conversion of atmospheric nitrogen by leguminous plants. |
| Policy Implications |
Improved nutrition and health of goats as an intermediate step in the improved nutrition and welfare of young children should form part of the policy of national, regional and district administrations. Guaranteed access to common land by landless and near landless farmers should be a high priority policy objective at all levels. |
|
| Research Findings |
Prosopis juliflora pods are a good source of protein and energy, possessing 12-14% crude protein on a dry basis (Wood et al., 2001a). This tree species is widely distributed in arid and semi-arid India. The pods were collected when they appeared on the trees in April and early May and stored (usually in gunny bags) for use later. This was a completely new practice in the all of the villages where the trials were conducted. Goat-keepers were advised to dry the pods thoroughly before storing them, otherwise there is a risk of infestation by pod-borer.
In on-farm trials in 1998 and 1999 (Trials 2 and 5 respectively) breeding does were fed a mixture (250 grams/day) of Prosopis juliflora pods and barley for 10 weeks, in equal proportions. The average weight of the does, most of which were of the Sirohi breed, was 25 Kg. The project suggested that half of the treatment be fed to the does in the morning and half in the evening, but most goat-keepers preferred to give it in the morning. The daily quantity to be fed was based on discussions between BAIF staff and the goat-keepers. It was thought that it would amount to 30-35% of a doe's daily dry-matter intake, and would result in minimal substitution effects.
Positive deworming results came from the use of a locally available material known to have anthelminthic properties - the trichomes (hairs) from the pods of a leguminous creeper, Mucuna pruriens . The dose, which was mixed with a lukewarm sugary solution (jaggery), was 20 mg per kg body weight. The idea for this treatment came from the fact that members of a local caste specializing in buffalo-keeping were known to use it.
These findings compliment other research that provides evidence of significant benefits from feeding protein supplements, and non-protein nitrogen supplements (Urea-Molasses Blocks). For example, research by Steel (2003) found that the response to protein supplementation of lambs infected with Trichostrongylus colubriformis depended on the metabolisable protein content of the diet and on the period of exposure to incoming larvae. Where the diet only meets requirements for maintenance or low growth rates, increased supply of rumen undegradable protein (or bypass protein supplements) enhances the immune response, reduces faecal egg counts, and expells adult worms. However, it does not appear to limit the initial establishment of incoming larvae. Furthermore, Knox (2003) demonstrated that in young sheep, supplementation with urea can achieve similar qualitative benefits in reducing the effects and level of infection with parasitic nematodes to that achieved with protein supplements. Urea–Molasses Blocks (UMB) are a popular low-cost means of delivering non-protein nitrogen. Experimental evidence shows that the use of UMB can have a beneficial impact by enhancing the resilience and resistance of sheep to infection with nematode parasites.
Management strategies that are aimed at maximising the acquisition of effective immune expression by smallstock, as outlined above, will have a major benefit in reducing requirements for chemical treatment of intestinal parasites, and increasing produciton levels. |
|
| References and Further Reading |
Feed supplementation for improving the productivity in goats
|
 |
| Deworming for improving the productivity in goats |
 |
| Increasing the productivity of indigenous goat production systems through participatory research in ethno-veterinary medicine: a case study from India |
 |
| Use of a Prosopis juliflora pods/Barley supplement to improve the reproductive performance of does |
 |
| Participatory technology development with livestock-keepers: A guide |
 |
| Participatory situation analysis with livestock keepers: A guide |
 |
| Experiences with on-farm feed supplementation trials in India, using a participatory approach |
 |
| Conroy, C. and Thakur, Y.A. (2002). Increasing the productivity of indigenous goat production systems through participatory research in ethnoveterinary medicine: a case study from India. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Responding to the Increasing Global Demand for Animal Products, 12-15 November 2002, Merida, Mexico. Pp. 67-68. |
|
| Conroy, C., Rangnekar, D.V., Sharma, M. and Vadher, M.H. (2000). Use of a Prosopis juliflora pods/barley supplement to improve the reproductive performance of does. In: Proc,VII Int.Conf.Goats 2: 986-987. |
|
| Hocking, D. and Kapila, D. (1992). Management and harvesting systems of fodder trees for sustainable goat production in Rajasthan , India . In: Proc,V Int.Conf.Goats 717-731. |
|
| Knox, M.R. (2003). Impact of non-protein nitrogen supplements on nematode infected sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43(12) 1463 - 1468. |
 |
| Steel, J.W. (2003). Effects of protein supplementation of young sheep on resistance development and resilience to parasitic nematodes. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43(12) 1469 - 1476. |
 |
|