Participatory research is not a clearly defined category. On approach has been to think of research involving farmers as on a scale from contractual through consultative and collaborative to collegiate (Biggs cited in Morton et al. 2002).
|
contractual |
farmers are compensated for use of their land and labour by researchers |
|
consultative |
researchers consult farmers about their problems |
|
collaborative |
researchers and farmers are partners |
|
collegiate |
researchers actively empower farmers to carry out their own research |
It is important to be clear about the objectives of participatory research – production of new technologies, adaptation of existing technologies, empowerment of farmers – which should determine how participatory a research project should be. It is also important to recognize that for a research project to be participatory, or at least collaborative, does not mean that all its research activities need be participatory – there will be space for researcher-managed trials and laboratory experiments that can be combined in various combinations and sequences with farmer-managed trials.
|
| References and Further Reading |
|
|
| Connell, J.G. (2000). Scaling-Up: The Roles of Participatory Technology Development and Participatory Extension Approaches. Pages 69-82 in: in: Stür, W.W., Horne, P.M., Hacker, J.B. and Kerridge, P.C. (eds). Working with Farmers: The Key to Adoption of Forage Technologies. Proceedings of an international workshop held in Cagayan de Oro. Philippines, 12-15 October 1999. ACIAR Proceedings No. 95, 325 pp. |
 |
 |
| Conroy, C. (2001). Participatory situation analysis with livestock keepers: A guide . Natural Resources Institute, Chatham. |
 |
|
| Conroy, C. (2002). Participatory technology development with livestock-keepers: A guide. Natural Resources Institute, Chatham. |
 |
|
| Conroy, C. (2005). Participatory Livestock Research – a Guide, Intermediate Technology Development Group, London. |
|
|
| Conroy, C., Thakur, Y. and Vadher, M. (2002). The efficacy of participatory development of technologies: experiences with resource-poor goat-keepers in India. Livestock Research in Rural Development 14 (3). |
 |
 |
Cramb, R. and Purcell, T. (2001). Developing Forage Technologies with Smallholder Farmers: How to Monitor and Evaluate Impacts. ACIAR Working Paper Series, No. 41 |
|
|
| Cramb, R.A. (2000). Processes Influencing the Successful Adoption of New Technologies by Smallholders. Pages 1-22 in: Stür, W.W., Horne, P.M., Hacker, J.B. and Kerridge, P.C. (eds). Working with Farmers: The Key to Adoption of Forage Technologies. Proceedings of an international workshop held in Cagayan de Oro. Philippines, 12-15 October 1999. ACIAR Proceedings No. 95, 325 pp. |
 |
 |
Horne, P.M., Magboo, E., Kerridge, P.C., Tuhulele, M., Phimphachanhvongsod, V., Gabunada Jr., F., Le Hoa Binh and Stür, W.W. (2000). Participatory Approaches to Forage Technology Development with Smallholders in Southeast Asia. Pages 23-31 in: Stür, W.W., Horne, P.M., Hacker, J.B. and Kerridge, P.C. (eds). Working with Farmers: The Key to Adoption of Forage Technologies. Proceedings of an international workshop held in Cagayan de Oro. Philippines, 12-15 October 1999. ACIAR Proceedings No. 95, 325 pp.
|
 |
 |
| Increasing the productivity of indigenous goat production systems through participatory research in ethno-veterinary medicine: a case study from India |
 |
|
Morton, J., Adolph, B., Ashley, S. and Romney, D. (2002). Conceptual, methodological and institutional issues in participatory livestock production research. Livestock Research in Rural Development 14 (4). |
 |
 |
Roothaert, R. and Karanja, G. (2000). Development of Fodder Tree Technologies through Participatory Research – Experiences from Central Kenya. Pages 227-233 in: in: Stür, W.W., Horne, P.M., Hacker, J.B. and Kerridge, P.C. (eds). Working with Farmers: The Key to Adoption of Forage Technologies. Proceedings of an international workshop held in Cagayan de Oro. Philippines, 12-15 October 1999. ACIAR Proceedings No. 95, 325 pp.
|
 |
 |
|