| What is Biosecurity? |
Biosecurity basically means protecting a flock or herd from infectious diseases. Biosecurity is a management process, and includes any precautionary measures that are taken to prevent diseases from emerging or from entering the livestock.
The concept is relatively new and different countries and different organisations use different definitions and place an emphasis on different biosecurity measures. FAO, for example, uses the term Biosecurity to broadly describe the process and objective of managing biological risks associated with food and agriculture in a holistic manner.
"Biosecurity is a strategic and integrated approach that encompasses the policy and regulatory frameworks (including instruments and activities) that analyse and manage risks in the sectors of food safety, animal life and health, and plant life and health, including associated environmental risk. Biosecurity covers the introduction of plant pests, animal pests and diseases, and zoonoses, the introduction and release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their products, and the introduction and management of invasive alien species and genotypes. Biosecurity is a holistic concept of direct relevance to the sustainability of agriculture, food safety, and the protection of the environment, including biodiversity."
(FAO, 2003)
Farm to farm movement of infected livestock is the most effective means by which many animal diseases, for example Foot and Mouth Disease, can be spread. The movement of contaminated clothes, boots, vehicles, agricultural and other equipment is another method by which diseases can be taken from one premises to another. Clearly, veterinarians could act as carriers if strict biosecurity measures are not employed. Diseases can also be spread by other means, such as wildlife, wind, or other vectors.
The most important biosecurity measures in more intensive production systems are:
- To ensure that methods of working with livestock are designed to minimise the movements of people, vehicles or equipment into areas where livestock are kept, including fields, sheds, markets or other holding areas. This will minimise the potential contamination of people, vehicles and equipment with material that could carry diseases, e.g. vehicles or carts transporting hay, other feeds, manure, milk, eggs and other products.
- If direct contact with livestock cannot be prevented then it is best practice to cleanse and disinfect protective clothing, footwear, equipment, vehicles etc. before and after the contact with the livestock.
No single biosecurity measure provides an answer to preventing all diseases. However, what is required is an integrated programme of related precautionary measures. At a local or individual farm level, the following should be considered:
| |
 |
Keep a flock or herd history. This records the details of all individual animals |
| |
 |
Start a herd or flock with good, healthy individuals |
| |
 |
Where possible, maintain a closed system, i.e. prevent unplanned contact with other animals over which you have no control |
| |
 |
Breed for resistance to locally common diseases |
| |
 |
Provide medication only as necessary, or as recommended by veterinarians |
| |
 |
Practice good sanitation and keep areas clean |
| |
 |
Provide adequate housing and shelter for all livestock |
| |
 |
Minimise stress |
| |
 |
Provide sufficient food, and ensure that a balanced ration is received - taking account of the different requirements at different seasons or periods of the year |
It is also important to apply biosecurity measures even when animals have been removed from the premises, as disease causing agents and their vectors can persist in the premises unless they are effectively eliminated.
|
| Biosecurity and Trade |
Food is an important item of trade, and one which is increasingly important in international trade. This includes livestock products, and in a very few cases may include live livestock as well (although this is decreasing). Quality of the product, quarantine regulations, biosecurity and trade policy issues become increasingly important, both as a means to facilitate trade as well as to impose preventative barriers. In terms of biosecurity, international trade in livestock and livestock products is normally subject to restrictions based on the content of the traded product, which should obviously be free of infectious agents, but most importantly, should originate from an area that is free from infection.
Animal disease control restrictions are some of the most widely used constraints to international trade in animal products. These affect
products that are not for human consumption, such as hides and skins, as
well as food products (as well as the export/import of live animals).
The major centres of consumption of animal products are countries of
relatively high per capita income and human population density. Most countries importing animal products for human consumption demand strict food safety standards. It can be very expensive to meet these requirements, and they would certainly prevent many potential exporters from gaining access to some markets (James, 2004). However, the failure of producers in exporting countries to meet the animal welfare and
environmental protection standards demanded by importing
countries is one of a number of reasons for restricting imports.
As public concern over such issues increases, it is more likely that they
will be used as a reason for restricting imports in the future, clearly emphasizing the needs for greater appreciation of the issues surrounding biosecurity and livestock in developing countries.
Food Safety
Food safety risks in international trade in animal products include zoonotic
diseases, other food-borne
pathogens, drug residues and the residues of other chemicals that may be contained in
animal products. These risks can all be managed at the level of the slaughter
and processing plants, and most importing countries will only accept animal
products for human consumption from plants that they have inspected and
approved.
Animal Disease
The principal animal disease concern in international trade is the
introduction of epidemic diseases such as foot-and-mouth disease. Some of
these diseases are readily introduced in animal products, and have the
capacity to spread very rapidly. The economic cost of dealing with outbreaks
can be very high. For example, the costs of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease (FMD)
outbreak in the United Kingdom were officially estimated to be £ 8 billion (James 2004).
A fundamental measure for management and control of animal disease risks is the control of those diseases deemed to be of greatest
significance in international trade. The OIE lists are widely used for this purpose: see below. (The former List "A" and List "B" diseases are now combined into a single list of "Diseases Notifiable to the OIE"). For example,
most importing countries will only accept meat from countries either free
of FMD or having zones free of the disease.
For some diseases, the overall animal production benefits, in terms of the increased trade opportunities, of controlling a disease may outweigh the costs of control - which can be considerable. However, in many situations it is not feasible to eradicate certain diseases. There may be a reservoir of infection in wildlife, or infection in neighbouring countries, or a largely uncontrollable but low level reservoir of infection in those domestic stock owned by the poorest members of the community. In such situations, exporting countries have to maintain a vaccinated zone, an unvaccinated buffer zone with intensive surveillance and an export zone. Movement of animals between zones must be strictly controlled. For many potential exporting countries the various costs (including social) and risks are prohibitive, and these countries are excluded from international trade in livestock products. Similar situations exist when considering other agricultural products.
However, it must also be recognised that the illegal trade in animal products (including for example the illegal trade in bushmeat from West Africa to Europe) presents much greater risk of introducing
exotic animal diseases than legal trade for most importing countries.
|
Diseases Notifiable to the OIE
(Source: OIE, 2004. Refer to the OIE web site for definitive lists)
|
| Multiple species diseases |
Sheep and Goat diseases |
- Anthrax
- Aujeszky's disease
- Echinococcosis/hydatidosis
- Heartwater
- Leptospirosis
- Q fever
- Rabies
- Paratuberculosis
- New world screwworm (Cochliomyia hominivorax)
- Old world screwworm (Chrysomya bezziana)
- Trichinellosis
- Foot and mouth disease
- Vesicular stomatitis
- Lumpy skin disease
- Bluetongue
- Rift Valley fever
|
- Ovine epididymitis (Brucella ovis)
- Caprine and ovine brucellosis (excluding B. ovis)
- Caprine arthritis/encephalitis
- Contagious agalactia
- Contagious caprine pleuropneumonia
- Enzootic abortion of ewes (ovine chlamydiosis)
- Ovine pulmonary adenomatosis
- Nairobi sheep disease
- Salmonellosis (S. abortusovis)
- Scrapie
- Maedi-visna
- Peste des petits ruminants
- Sheep pox and goat pox
|
| Avian (Poultry) diseases |
Swine diseases |
- Avian infectious bronchitis
- Avian infectious laryngotracheitis
- Avian tuberculosis
- Duck virus hepatitis
- Duck virus enteritis
- Fowl cholera
- Fowl pox
- Fowl typhoid
- Infectious bursal disease (Gumboro disease)
- Marek's disease
- Avian mycoplasmosis (M. gallisepticum)
- Avian chlamydiosis
- Pullorum disease
- Highly pathogenic avian influenza
- Newcastle disease
|
- Atrophic rhinitis of swine
- Porcine cysticercosis
- Porcine brucellosis
- Transmissible gastroenteritis
- Enterovirus encephalomyelitis
- Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome
- Swine vesicular disease
- African swine fever
- Classical swine fever
|
| Bee diseases |
Lagomorph (Rabbit) diseases |
- Acarapisosis of honey bees
- American foulbrood of honey bees
- European foulbrood of honey bees
- Varroosis of honey bees
- Tropilaelaps infestation of honey bees
|
- Myxomatosis
- Tularemia
- Rabbit haemorrhagic disease
|
|
| References and Further Reading |
|
|
| Christensen, J.P. (1999). Diseases as a Risk Factor in Relation to the Rural Poultry Model in Bangladesh. Poultry as a Tool in poverty Eradication and Promotion of Gender Equality - Proceedings of a Workshop, March 22-26, 1999 Tune Landboskole, Denmark, Organized by Danish Agricultural and Rural Development Advisers Forum. |
 |
|
| FAO. (2003). Biosecurity in Food and Agriculture. Committee on Agriculture, Seventeenth Session. 31 March-4 April 2003. FAO, Rome. |
|
 |
| A.D. James, A.D. (2004). Disease and biosecurity constraints to trade in animal products. In: Owen, E., Smith, T., Steele, M.A., Anderson, S. Duncan, A.J., Herrero, M., Leaver, J.D., Reynolds, C.K., Richards, J.I. and Ku-Vera, J.C. (eds). Responding to the Livestock Revolution. BSAS Publication No. 33. ISBN 1-904761-51-8. |
|
|
| Upton, M. and Otte, J. (2004). The impact of trade agreements on livestock producers. In: Owen, E., Smith, T., Steele, M.A., Anderson, S. Duncan, A.J., Herrero, M., Leaver, J.D., Reynolds, C.K., Richards, J.I. and Ku-Vera, J.C. (eds). Responding to the Livestock Revolution. BSAS Publication No. 33. ISBN 1-904761-51-8. |
|
|
| OIE. Diseases Notifiable to the OIE. http://www.oie.int/eng/maladies/en_classification.htm |
|
 |
| OIE: Technical disease cards. http://www.oie.int/eng/maladies/en_fiches.htm |
|
 |
|